Articles By Us
- New News On Excluding Unreliable Expert Testimony
- Class Action Reform: Class Action Reform Legislation Passed By Congress
- Supreme Court Holds That 10-Year Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Actions in CCP § 337.15 is not Subject to Equitable Tolling While Promises to Repair
- Second Appellate District Clarifies Two-year Statute of Limitations on Personal Injury Claims
- Employer Terminated At-Will Employee for Failing to "Retreat" from a Fight at Work
- Employer Terminated Employee for Misusing Family Leave
- Favoritism Due to Consensual Romantic Relationships is not Actionable Discrimination and can not Support Claim of Unlawful Retaliation
- Employment Law: Another Hurdle for California Employers: Employer Liability for Sexual Harassment by Non-Employees
- Employment Law: California Legislature Mandates Sexual Harassment Training
- Employment Law: California and U.S. Supreme Courts Addesss Retaliation Claims in Employment Suits
- Fair Labor Standards Act: New Overtime Rules Take Effect
- Employment Law: Paid Family Leave Creates New Benefits For Employees and Increased Legal Concerns for California Employers
- Employment Law: Understanding the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Nestle Corporation Properly Enjoined Under California's Unfair Competetion Statute for Age Discrimination
- Refusal to Terminate "Unattractive" Employee is Protected Activity Sufficient to Support Claim of Retaliation
- Supreme Court Grants Review of Retaliation Case Involving Refusal to Terminate "Unattractive" Employee
- Supreme Court Holds That Non-Statutory Wrongful Termination Claims are Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Ethics: Ethical Issues in the Use of Trial Consultants
- Federal Privacy Rights: Supreme Court Reviews Right to Recover for Invasion of Privacy
- Defending Elder Abuse Claims
- Health Law: Recent Trends in Elder Abuse Litigation
- Health Law: Tips for Defending and Traps to Avoid in Representing Nursing Homes
- Highlighting: M&C's Northern California Office
- Insurance Coverage: There are no Absolutes; California Supreme Court Says Absolute Pollution Exclusion does not Preclude Coverage for Pesticide Death
- No Assurances - Insurance coverage for the events of September 11 will hinge upon the interpretation of often ambiguous policy language
- Insurance: "Passing the Buck": Focus on Addtional Insured Issues
- Intellectual Property: Pop-Up or Pop Out?
- Globalization Of Trademark Protection: The Madrid Protocol
- Law & Appellate: California Appellate Court Finds Unambiguous Language to be Against Public Policy
- The New "110-Day Barrier" on Motions for Summary Judgment
- Litigation: How To Avoid Being Sued
- Personal Injury: California Senate Bill 688
- Personal Injury: The Toxic Mold Protection Act of 2001 and its Effect on Personal Injury Claims
- Update on Senate Bill 688
- Services: M&C Provides Mediation Services for Insurers
- Spotlight On: German Internship Program
- Contingent Fees Paid To Attorneys Is Taxable Income
- Supreme Court Ruling: Violations Of CAL-OSHA Regulations Admissible In A Third Party Action
- California’s Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64
